Proven Performance
Low need for Brady/ATP
S-ICD is recommended for most ICD-indicated patients, without the need for pacing, in the following guidelines:
- Class I, 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines2
- Class IIa, 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS and 2015 ESC Guidelines2,3
Although S-ICD lacks Brady pacing and ATP functionality, there is relatively low demand for these in patients with an ICD indication receiving an S-ICD6,8,10-12
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b8a3/0b8a3d90db2036c0e57ef61eeeda15df0a4fd786" alt="Patient Demographic"
The MODULAR ATP study, which is currently enrolling patients, is designed to demonstrate the safety, performance and effectiveness of the mCRM™ System (EMBLEM™ S-ICD System and EMPOWER™ Modular Pacing System) for those few patients who may need Brady pacing or ATP at implant, or may develop a need in the future.
All EMBLEM™ S-ICDs are, by design, compatible with the EMPOWER™ Leadless Pacemaker*.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412fe/412fe99b4dfea18eeb2d5aca00a9e3f192734355" alt="ATP header"
Real-World Data
Implantation technique
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e60f5/e60f59b726c5cdc5e54ecd3a16728a371a94663b" alt="Pie Charts"
Optimised programming
Long-term use
The HONEST independent cohort study, supported long-term S-ICD use in a real-world setting, with 4,924 patients enrolled across 150 centres in France.12
Similar to the PRAETORIAN Trial, S-ICDs enrolled in the HONEST cohort demonstrated high efficacy, low rates of complications, as well as low inappropriate shock rates; in long-term real-world settings, in a varied patient cohort.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0912a/0912ae0485abd863a80b8a4caa3528798c7ff2ba" alt="Receive our latest S-ICD Clinical Report"