True-PTX-web banner

TRUE-PTX Study

PTA+/-BMS increases the odds of amputation by 30%

True-PTX Clinical Trial Results

TRUE-PTX is a comprehensive study comparing Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting and bare device treatment for Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) using real-world data*. This analysis, which includes over 10,000 patients in the United States, examines 12-month amputation and readmission rates.

This large-scale, near-real-time clinical evidence leveraging Truveta aggregated electronic health record (EHR) data shows that PAD treatment with paclitaxel drug-eluting devices may reduce the risk of amputation and readmission vs. treatment with non-drug devices.


Treatment with a non-DE device increases odds for any amputation by

30%

Treatment with a non-DE device increases odds for readmission3 by

15%

TRUE-PTX Study Design and Population​

The objective was to compare outcomes in patients with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) treated with Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting devices (DCB, DES) versus those treated with non-DE devices (BMS, PTA). The study design involved a comparative propensity score-matched analysis of de-identified electronic health record (EHR) data. 

Patients with PAD undergoing endovascular femoropopliteal balloon or stent therapy (± paclitaxel)​

N = 10,474

True-PTX pie chart

Data source was Truveta, which aggregates normalized EHR data from more than 120 million de-identified patient records across more than 30 U.S. health systems.

TRUE-PTX Comparative Analysis2 Results

Outcomes before propensity score matching

12-month amputations and readmissions occurred significantly less frequently for patients treated with a DE device

 DENon-DEP-value
Any Limb Amputation7.5%8.9%0.01
Same Limb Amputation1.5%2.3%0.003
Any Readmission53.8%57.8%<0.001
Readmission with a DE or non-DE intervention15.1%16.8%0.022

Mortality**

 DENon-DEP-value
30 daysa   
52985145 
Event rate 12 monthsb2.6%2.5%0.801
N13061570 
Event rate23.4%21.7%0.296

Outcomes after propensity score matching

Patients treated with non-DE devices were more likely to have any amputation, any readmission and readmission associated with a DE or non-DE procedure


Treatment with a non-DE device increases odds for any amputation by

30%

Treatment with a non-DE device increases odds for readmission3 by

15%


References

1. Exact matching method.
2. Brodmann, M. TRUE-PTX: the study of drug-eluting vs bare device therapies for PAD in the real world: 12-month amputation and readmission rates in a large population. Presented at LINC 28 Jan 2025.
3. Readmission with another DE or non-DE intervention

*Truveta aggregates normalized EHR data from more than 120 million de-identified patient records across more than 30 U.S. health systems
**No significant between-group differences for mortality.

Caution:
The law restricts these devices to sale by or on the order of a physician. Indications, contraindications, warnings, and instructions for use can be found in the product labelling supplied with each device or at www.IFU-BSCI.com. Products shown for INFORMATION purposes only and may not be approved or for sale in certain countries. This material not intended for use in France.