In May 2019, TheJournal of Urology published An Algorithmic Approach to Implementation of a Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Results in a Decrease in Reusable Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Repair Costs.
In March 2018, The Journal of Endourology published Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
In March 2018, The Journal of Endourology published In Vitro Evaluation Comparing LithoVue to a Pusen Single-Use Ureteroscope and a Karl Storz Reusable Scope.
In September 2017, The Journal of Endourology published Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Versus Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopy Use.
In January/February 2017, Communique, a publication of the International Association of Healthcare Central Service Material Management, published A Glimpse at the True Cost of Reprocessing Endoscopes: Results of a Pilot Project.
In June 2016, The Journal of Endourology published Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
