Skip to main content

My account

Boston Scientific accounts are for healthcare professionals only.

Create an account to access online training and education on EDUCARE, manage your customer profile, and connect with customer support and service teams.

My Boston Scientific account

Access your online applications and manage your customer profile.

Manage my Boston Scientific account

Quick Links

Contact a representative Online education and training Order products online Reimbursement resources Return a product Customer support

Call customer care

1 (888) 272-1001

LithoVue™ Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope

References

  1. Song HJ, Cho ST, Kim KK. Investigation of the location of the ureteral stone and diameter of the ureter in patients with renal colic. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(3):198-201.
  2. Mues AC, Knudsen BE. Evaluation of 24 holmium: YAG laser optical fibers for flexible ureteroscopy. J Urol. 2009;182:348-54.
  3. Carey RI, Gomez CS, Maurici G, et al. Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. J Urol. 2006;176:607-10.
  4. Collins JW, Keeley FX, Timoney A. Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy. Br J Urol. 2004;93(7):1023-6.
  5. Carey RI, Martin CJ, Knego JR. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary Care center with multiple surgeons. Urology. 2014;84:42-5.
  6. Shah K, Monga M, Knudsen B. Prospective randomized trial comparing 2 flexible digital ureteroscopes: ACMI/Olympus Invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V. Urology. 2015;85(6):1267-71.
  7. Knudsen BE, Ferraro M. Digital video flexible ureteroscopy: GyrusACMI/Olympus Invisio®DUR®-D twelve month failure and repair experience. NCS 2009.
  8. Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, et al. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: A randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology. 2010;75:534-9.
  9. Eisner B. Evaluating the image quality of a novel single-use digital flexible ureteroscope. J Endourol. 2015;29(1):A348.
  10. Sung C, Singh H, Schwartz M, et al. Evaluation of efficacy of novel optically activated digital endoscope protection system against laser energy damage. Urology. 2008;72(1):57-60.
  11. Olympus Corporation of the Americas. Olympus Product Catalog. Olympus, Your Vision, Our Future. 2015. Web. Accessed May 12, 2015.
  12. User HM, Hua V, Blunt LW, et al. Performance and durability of leading flexible ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2004;18(8):735-8.
  13. Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, et al. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and a conventional flexible ureteroscope. J Urol. 2009;182:2347-51.
  14. Semins MJ, George S, Allaf ME, et al. Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: The effect on repair costs. J Endourol. 2009;23(6):903-5.
  15. Somani BK, Robertson A, Kata SG. Decreasing the cost of flexible ureterorenoscopic procedures. Urology. 2011;78(3):528-30.
  16. Chiu K, Cai Y, Marcovich R, et al. Comparison of the mechanical, flow, and optical properties of contemporary flexible ureteroscopes. Urology. 2003;62(5):800-4.
  17. Value Vantage. Day-in-the-Life Research, May 2014.
  18. Muggeo E, Boissel A, Martin L, et al. Cost comparison of two reprocessing procedures of flexible ureteroscopes at the University Hospital of Dijon [CHU de Dijon]. Prog Urol. 2015;25(6):318-24.
  19. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wages. May 2014: 31-9093 Medical Equipment Preparers. Occupational Employment Statistics. March 2015. Accessed May 27, 2015.
  20. Laurentian Bank Securities. Analyst Report. 2013.
  21. Forte L, Shum C. Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:105.
  22. Xrates. Exchange Rate Average (Euro, US Dollar). Accessed May 28, 2015.
  23. ASGE Technology Committee. Technology status evaluation report. Automated endoscope reprocessors. Gastrol Endoscopy. 2010;72(4):675-80.
  24. Communication from FDA, CDC and the VA. Preventing Cross-Contamination in Endoscope Processing: FDA Safety Communication. Issued November 19, 2009. https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm190273.htm. Accessed May 20, 2015.
  25. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee HICPAC. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
  26. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Standard 58: Chemical sterilization and high-level disinfection in health care facilities. AAMI, 2013.
  27. Sterile Processing University, LLC. Announcing the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes course on line. 2015. https://www.spdceus.com/modules/first/gi/. Accessed May 12, 2015.
  28. CBSPD, INC. Announcing the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes courses on-line. June 2015. https://sterileprocessing.org/courses/courses1.htm. Accessed June 8, 2015.
  29. Olympus Corporation of the Americas. Reprocessing Specialist Training. 2015. https://www.oly*mpusuniversity.com/coursedetail.aspx?lpid=32. Accessed May 12, 2015.
  30. Sung JC, Springhart WP, Marguet CG, et al. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology. 2005;66:958-63.
  31. Ofstead CL, Wetzler HP, Snyder AK, et al. Endoscope reprocessing methods. A prospective study on the impact of human factors and automation. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2010;33(4):304-11.
  32. Hession SM. Endoscope disinfection by orthophthalaldehyde in a clinical setting: An evaluation of reprocessing time and costs compared with glutaraldehyde. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2003;26(3):110-4.
  33. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index. Medical Care Services. June 30, 2015.
  34. Ofstead CL, et al. Factors that contribute to nonadherence with endoscope reprocessing guidelines: A prospective study overview of findings from the CLEANR study. CLEANR Endoscope Nonadherence Study, 2010. Published by Ethicon, 2010.
  35. Sooriakumaran P, Kaba R, Andrews HO, et al. Evaluation of the mechanisms of damage to flexible ureteroscopes and suggestions for ureteroscope preservation. Asian J Androl. 2005;66:958-63.
  36. Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, et al. Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology. 2003;62:218-22.
  37. Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, et al. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureteroscopy procedures? J Endourol. 2010;24(12),1929-34.
  38. Somani BK, Al-Qahtani SM, de Medina SD, et al. Outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: Comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope. Urology. 2013;82(5):1017-9.
  39. Macario A. Editorial. What does one minute of operating room time cost? J Clin Anesth. 2010;22:233-6.
  40. Strategic Health Resources. National SGNA Congress – Presentation. 2012.
  41. Alfa MJ, Olson N, Degagne P. Automated washing with the Reliance Endoscope Processing System and its equivalence to optimal manual cleaning. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34:561-70.
  42. ECRI Institute. Inadequate reprocessing of endoscopes and surgical instruments [hazard no. 4]. In: Top10 health technology hazards for 2015: key safety threats to manage in the coming year [guidance article]. Nov, 2014.
  43. ECRI Institute. Endoscope Reprocessing Systems. Tech IQ. 2014.
  44. Public Health Agency of Canada. Infection Prevention and Control Guideline for Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Flexible Bronchoscopy. October 2, 2011. Accessed August 3, 2015.
  45. Olympus Medical Systems Corporation. Uretero-reno videoscope Olympus URF Type V. Japan, 2014.
  46. PENTAX Medical Company. Pentax ureteroreno fiberscope FUR-9P. Japan, 2011.
  47. Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation. Flexible fiber ureterorenoscopes 7325.071/7325.076. United States, 2013.
  48. Stryker Corporation. Stryker ideal eyes HD URT-7000S/7000Si flexible video ureteroscope. United States, 2012.
  49. Pfiedler Enterprises. The care and handling of rigid and flexible scopes (an online continuing education activity). Aurora, CO, 2013.
  50. Clemens JQ, Dowling R, Foley F, et al. Joint AUA/SUNA white paper on reprocessing of flexible cystoscopes. J Urol. 2014;184(6):2241-5.
  51. Park S, Jang JY, Koo JS, et al. A review of current disinfectants for gastrointestinal endoscopic reprocessing. Clin Endosc. 2013;6(4):337-41.
  52. Smith DR, Wang RS. Glutaraldehyde exposure and its occupational impact in the health care environment. Environ Health Prev Med. 2006;11(1):3-10.
  53. Takigawa T, Endo Y. Effects of glutaraldehyde exposure on human health. J Occup Health. 2006;48(2):75-87.
  54. Rideout K, Teschke K, Dimich-Ward H, et al. Considering risks to healthcare workers from glutaraldehyde alternatives in high-level disinfection. J Hosp Infect. 2005;59(1):4-11.
  55. https://www.cms.gov/license/ama?file=/files/zip/2023-nfrm-opps-addenda.zip (Addendum B)
  56. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service- Payment/HospitalOutpatientPPS/passthrough_payment
  57. https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-23918.pdf (pages 345, 479-485)
  58. https://www.cms.gov/files/zip/january-2023-alpha-numeric-hcpcs-file.zip
  59. https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/manuals/downloads/clm104c04.pdf
Top