Skip to main content

My account

Boston Scientific accounts are for healthcare professionals only.

Create an account to access online training and education on EDUCARE, manage your customer profile, and connect with customer support and service teams.

My Boston Scientific account

Access your online applications and manage your customer profile.

Quick Links

Call customer care

Two surgeons in operating room

Economic value

Examine the economic advantages of using the EMBOLD™ Detachable Coil System compared to other coils.

Every case, covered.

The Embold Detachable Coil System is a complete portfolio of three types of fully retractable embolic coils designed to handle most peripheral embolization cases. Together, the EMBOLD™ Fibered Coil, the EMBOLD™ Packing Coil, and the EMBOLD™ Soft Coil maximize economic value by reducing the number of coils on the shelf by half, simplifying workflow and streamlining inventory. 

Fewer coils to occlude vs competitors1

Using fewer coils equates to shorter procedure times, preserving more vessel segments, and higher cost savings. See the difference from a pre-clinical porcine model. 

5 vs 3 Coils

Embold Fibered Coil shown in left internal femoral artery Ruby Standard Coil shown in left internal femoral artery

Left internal femoral artery
5 Ruby Standard 6x20

Embold Fibered Coil shown in right internal femoral artery Embold Fibered Coil shown in right internal femoral artery

Right internal femoral artery
3 Embold Fibered Coil 6x20

5 vs 3 Coils

Ruby Standard Coil shown in iliac right artery Ruby Standard Coil shown in right internal iliac artery

Right Internal Iliac Artery
5 Ruby Standard 6x20

Embold Fibered Coil shown in left internal iliac artery Embold Fibered Coil shown in left internal iliac artery

Left Internal Iliac Artery
3 Embold Fibered Coil 6x20

3 vs 2 Coils

Ruby Standard Coil shown  in right subclavian medial Ruby Standard Coil shown in right subclavian medial

Right Subclavian Medial
3 Ruby Standard 6x20

Embold Fibered Coil shown  in left subclavian medial Embold Fibered Coil shown in left subclavian medial

Left Subclavian Medial
2 Embold Fibered Coil 6x20

Faster occlusion time vs. competitors

Embold Fibered Coil Time to Occlusion2

Graph showing competitors range from 20-68% more occlusion than Embold Fibered Coil.

Embold Packing Coil Time to Occlusion3

Graph showing competitors range from 30-40% more occlusion than Embold Packing Coil.

Embold Soft Coil Time to Occlusion4

Graph showing competitors range from 30-250% more occlusion than Embold Soft Coil.

Improved operational and procedural efficiency

  • All three coils in the Embold Coil System accommodate .021” to .027” ID microcatheters, which provides procedural flexibility, plus a simplified training and reorder process.
  • Embold’s handle-free detachment eliminates the need for an ancillary device, saving time and cost during the procedure.
  • With a Nitinol delivery system that resists kinking, the Embold Coil System is designed for exceptional deliverability and has a lower risk of premature detachment.

References

1.  Evaluation conducted in a pre-clinical porcine model. Coils were deployed every 3 minutes until complete occlusion was achieved. Complete occlusion was defined as TIMI Grade 0 (no antegrade flow beyond the point of occlusion) and assessed by the physician evaluator. Contralateral vessel pairs of comparable diameters were used for each assessment. For EMBOLD Soft comparisons, 3 replicates were conducted. For EMBOLD Fibered, 4 replicates were conducted. For Embold Soft comparisons, the longest coil length commercially available for each coil type was used: Concerto 4mm x 10cm/Embold Soft 4mm x 30cm and Ruby Soft 6mm x 30cm/Embold Soft 6mm x 60cm. For Embold Fibered, comparable coil lengths were evaluated to assess fiber vs. metal impact: Ruby Standard 6mm x 20cm/Embold Fibered 6mm x 20cm. med six times. Testing done at an independent facility. Bench Test study results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance.
2. In vitro bench model: testing results from bovine blood flow loop. Occlusion time is an average of a single 6 x 20 coil from each manufacturer performed six times. Testing done at an independent facility. Bench test or pre-clinical study results may not be necessarily indicative of clinical performance.
3. In vitro bench model: testing results from bovine blood flow loop. Occlusion time is an average of a single 30 cm coil from each manufacturer performed six times. Testing done at an independent facility. Bench Test study results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance.
4. In vitro bench model: testing results from bovine blood flow loop. Occlusion time is an average of a single 3 x 15 coil from each manufacturer, except for Concerto with two 3 x 8 coils, performed six times. Testing done at an independent facility. Bench Test study results may not necessarily be indicative of clinical performance.