GUIDEZILLA™ II
Guide Extension Catheter
13% Increased Back-Out Support*
96% Less Frictional Force†
34% More Pushable‡
† Lubricity and Durability of Coating Bench Test, GuideLiner V3 6F vs GUIDEZILLA II 6F Long (n = 8). Data on file at Boston Scientific.
‡ Full Unit Push Bench Test, GuideLiner V3 6F vs GUIDEZILLA II 6F (n = 8). Data on file at Boston Scientific.
Competitive Design Comparison
![Competitive Design Comparison](https://www.bostonscientific.com/en-IN/products/catheters-guide/guidezilla-II-guide-extension-catheter/clinical-outcomes/_jcr_content/maincontent-par/image_1010603395.img.competitive-design-comparison-table.png)
Inner and Outer Diameter Comparisonb
- 0.001" Larger ID on 6F, 7F, and 8F — Allows more room to deliver interventional devices
- 0.002" Smaller OD on 7F and 8F — Takes up less room in the guide catheter
![Inner and Outer Diameter Comparison](https://www.bostonscientific.com/en-IN/products/catheters-guide/guidezilla-II-guide-extension-catheter/clinical-outcomes/_jcr_content/maincontent-par/image_726997339.img.diameter-comparison-table.png)