GUIDEZILLA™ II

Guide Extension Catheter

More Pushable, Less Frictional Force, and Superior Back-Out Support.

Learn more about how GUIDEZILLA II Guide Extension Catheter compares to GuideLiner™ V3 Catheter.
Guidezilla II

icon_document.png

Indications, Safety, and Warnings
 

13% Increased Back-Out Support*

Back-Out Support: With guide catheter and guide extension devices in place, the amount of force applied to an SDS that results in the guide tip backing out of position.

Back-Out Support Bench Test

13% Increased Back-Out Support*
 
 

96% Less Frictional Force†

Distal Shaft Frictional Force: The amount of force required to move the distal shaft against a set normal force.

Lubricity and Durability of Coating Bench Test

96% Less Frictional Force†
 
 

34% More Pushable‡

Full Unit Pushability: A measure of the ability to transmit force to the tip of the catheter while advancing against a hard stop.

Full Unit Push Bench Test

34% More Pushable‡
* Back-Out Support Bench Test, GuideLiner V3 6F vs GUIDEZILLA II 6F (n = 8). Data on file at Boston Scientific.
† Lubricity and Durability of Coating Bench Test, GuideLiner V3 6F vs GUIDEZILLA II 6F Long (n = 8). Data on file at Boston Scientific.
‡ Full Unit Push Bench Test, GuideLiner V3 6F vs GUIDEZILLA II 6F (n = 8). Data on file at Boston Scientific.
 

Competitive Design Comparison

Competitive Design Comparison
aInformation taken from GuideLiner V3 Product Brochure.
 

Inner and Outer Diameter Comparisonb

  • 0.001" Larger ID on 6F, 7F, and 8F — Allows more room to deliver interventional devices
  • 0.002" Smaller OD on 7F and 8F — Takes up less room in the guide catheter
Inner and Outer Diameter Comparison
bGuideLiner V3 ID Measurements from Directions for Use.
 
 
 
GuideZilla II™ Guide Extension Catheter, Home
Home
GuideZilla II™ Guide Extension Catheter, Case Study
Case Study
GuideZilla II™ Guide Extension Catheter, Reimbursement
Reimbursement
 
 
Top