Ureteroscopio Flexible Digital de un solo uso LithoVue™
Referencias
- Song HJ, Cho ST, Kim KK. Investigation of the location of the ureteral stone and diameter of the ureter in patients with renal colic. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(3):198-201.
- Mues AC, Knudsen BE. Evaluation of 24 holmium: YAG laser optical fibers for flexible ureteroscopy. J Urol. 2009;182:348-54.
- Carey RI, Gomez CS, Maurici G, et al. Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center. J Urol. 2006;176:607-10.
- Collins JW, Keeley FX, Timoney A. Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy. Br J Urol. 2004;93(7):1023-6.
- Carey RI, Martin CJ, Knego JR. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary Care center with multiple surgeons. Urology. 2014;84:42-5.
- Shah K, Monga M, Knudsen B. Prospective randomized trial comparing 2 flexible digital ureteroscopes: ACMI/Olympus Invisio DUR-D and Olympus URF-V. Urology. 2015;85(6):1267-71.
- Knudsen BE, Ferraro M. Digital video flexible ureteroscopy: GyrusACMI/Olympus Invisio®DUR®-D twelve month failure and repair experience. NCS 2009.
- Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, et al. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: A randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology. 2010;75:534-9.
- Eisner B. Evaluating the image quality of a novel single-use digital flexible ureteroscope. J Endourol. 2015;29(1):A348.
- Sung C, Singh H, Schwartz M, et al. Evaluation of efficacy of novel optically activated digital endoscope protection system against laser energy damage. Urology. 2008;72(1):57-60.
- Olympus Corporation of the Americas. Olympus Product Catalog. Olympus, Your Vision, Our Future. 2015. Web. Accessed May 12, 2015.
- User HM, Hua V, Blunt LW, et al. Performance and durability of leading flexible ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2004;18(8):735-8.
- Boylu U, Oommen M, Thomas R, et al. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and a conventional flexible ureteroscope. J Urol. 2009;182:2347-51.
- Semins MJ, George S, Allaf ME, et al. Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: The effect on repair costs. J Endourol. 2009;23(6):903-5.
- Somani BK, Robertson A, Kata SG. Decreasing the cost of flexible ureterorenoscopic procedures. Urology. 2011;78(3):528-30.
- Chiu K, Cai Y, Marcovich R, et al. Comparison of the mechanical, flow, and optical properties of contemporary flexible ureteroscopes. Urology. 2003;62(5):800-4.
- Value Vantage. Day-in-the-Life Research, May 2014.
- Muggeo E, Boissel A, Martin L, et al. Cost comparison of two reprocessing procedures of flexible ureteroscopes at the University Hospital of Dijon [CHU de Dijon]. Prog Urol. 2015;25(6):318-24.
- United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment and Wages. May 2014: 31-9093 Medical Equipment Preparers. Occupational Employment Statistics. March 2015. Accessed May 27, 2015.
- Laurentian Bank Securities. Analyst Report. 2013.
- Forte L, Shum C. Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011;11:105.
- Xrates. Exchange Rate Average (Euro, US Dollar). Accessed May 28, 2015.
- ASGE Technology Committee. Technology status evaluation report. Automated endoscope reprocessors. Gastrol Endoscopy. 2010;72(4):675-80.
- Communication from FDA, CDC and the VA. Preventing Cross-Contamination in Endoscope Processing: FDA Safety Communication. Issued November 19, 2009. https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm190273.htm. Accessed May 20, 2015.
- Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee HICPAC. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
- Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Standard 58: Chemical sterilization and high-level disinfection in health care facilities. AAMI, 2013.
- Sterile Processing University, LLC. Announcing the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes course on line. 2015. https://www.spdceus.com/modules/first/gi/. Accessed May 12, 2015.
- CBSPD, INC. Announcing the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes courses on-line. June 2015. https://sterileprocessing.org/courses/courses1.htm. Accessed June 8, 2015.
- Olympus Corporation of the Americas. Reprocessing Specialist Training. 2015. https://www.oly*mpusuniversity.com/coursedetail.aspx?lpid=32. Accessed May 12, 2015.
- Sung JC, Springhart WP, Marguet CG, et al. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage. Urology. 2005;66:958-63.
- Ofstead CL, Wetzler HP, Snyder AK, et al. Endoscope reprocessing methods. A prospective study on the impact of human factors and automation. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2010;33(4):304-11.
- Hession SM. Endoscope disinfection by orthophthalaldehyde in a clinical setting: An evaluation of reprocessing time and costs compared with glutaraldehyde. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2003;26(3):110-4.
- United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index. Medical Care Services. June 30, 2015.
- Ofstead CL, et al. Factors that contribute to nonadherence with endoscope reprocessing guidelines: A prospective study overview of findings from the CLEANR study. CLEANR Endoscope Nonadherence Study, 2010. Published by Ethicon, 2010.
- Sooriakumaran P, Kaba R, Andrews HO, et al. Evaluation of the mechanisms of damage to flexible ureteroscopes and suggestions for ureteroscope preservation. Asian J Androl. 2005;66:958-63.
- Landman J, Lee DI, Lee C, et al. Evaluation of overall costs of currently available small flexible ureteroscopes. Urology. 2003;62:218-22.
- Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, et al. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureteroscopy procedures? J Endourol. 2010;24(12),1929-34.
- Somani BK, Al-Qahtani SM, de Medina SD, et al. Outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: Comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope. Urology. 2013;82(5):1017-9.
- Macario A. Editorial. What does one minute of operating room time cost? J Clin Anesth. 2010;22:233-6.
- Strategic Health Resources. National SGNA Congress – Presentation. 2012.
- Alfa MJ, Olson N, Degagne P. Automated washing with the Reliance Endoscope Processing System and its equivalence to optimal manual cleaning. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34:561-70.
- ECRI Institute. Inadequate reprocessing of endoscopes and surgical instruments [hazard no. 4]. In: Top10 health technology hazards for 2015: key safety threats to manage in the coming year [guidance article]. Nov, 2014.
- ECRI Institute. Endoscope Reprocessing Systems. Tech IQ. 2014.
- Public Health Agency of Canada. Infection Prevention and Control Guideline for Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Flexible Bronchoscopy. October 2, 2011. Accessed August 3, 2015.
- Olympus Medical Systems Corporation. Uretero-reno videoscope Olympus URF Type V. Japan, 2014.
- PENTAX Medical Company. Pentax ureteroreno fiberscope FUR-9P. Japan, 2011.
- Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation. Flexible fiber ureterorenoscopes 7325.071/7325.076. United States, 2013.
- Stryker Corporation. Stryker ideal eyes HD URT-7000S/7000Si flexible video ureteroscope. United States, 2012.
- Pfiedler Enterprises. The care and handling of rigid and flexible scopes (an online continuing education activity). Aurora, CO, 2013.
- Clemens JQ, Dowling R, Foley F, et al. Joint AUA/SUNA white paper on reprocessing of flexible cystoscopes. J Urol. 2014;184(6):2241-5.
- Park S, Jang JY, Koo JS, et al. A review of current disinfectants for gastrointestinal endoscopic reprocessing. Clin Endosc. 2013;6(4):337-41.
- Smith DR, Wang RS. Glutaraldehyde exposure and its occupational impact in the health care environment. Environ Health Prev Med. 2006;11(1):3-10.
- Takigawa T, Endo Y. Effects of glutaraldehyde exposure on human health. J Occup Health. 2006;48(2):75-87.
- Rideout K, Teschke K, Dimich-Ward H, et al. Considering risks to healthcare workers from glutaraldehyde alternatives in high-level disinfection. J Hosp Infect. 2005;59(1):4-11.